· 2026-07-10

Chicago Bears argue that Sports Illustrated undervalued rookie Dillon Thieneman, rating him 26th in first‑round upside despite the team’s belief his talent belongs among the top prospects. The Bears, sitting 2nd in the NFC with an 11‑6 record and on a two‑game losing streak, see Thieneman as a potential game‑changer for their offense.
SI’s analysts placed Thieneman at 26th based on combine metrics and college production at Ohio State. They highlighted his 4.55‑second 40‑yard dash and 4.5‑second shuttle as solid but not elite. The publication also noted his limited snap count in his final college season, suggesting a learning curve ahead. Those numbers helped shape the middle‑of‑the‑pack projection.
Chicago’s scouting department points to Thieneman’s route‑running precision and ability to create separation after the snap. Coach Matt Eberflus praised his football IQ during preseason, noting the rookie “makes adjustments on the fly that most first‑year players struggle with.” The Bears believe his hands and vision could translate into a reliable third‑down target, especially with Justin Fields still developing under center.
If Thieneman earns a spot in the rotation, he could relieve pressure on the passing game during the Bears’ two‑game skid. His presence would give Fields a versatile weapon against defenses that have been keying the tight end. The team hopes his speed will stretch the field, opening up running lanes for Khalil Herbert and the offensive line.
Chicago will evaluate his performance in the upcoming preseason finale before finalizing the depth chart. The Bears’ next matchup is against the Carolina Panthers on 2026-09-13, a test that could showcase Thieneman’s ability to contribute in a real‑game scenario. A strong showing could force the coaching staff to adjust their game plan and give the rookie more snaps.
The disagreement underscores Chicago’s confidence in its scouting process. While SI offers a national perspective, the Bears rely on internal evaluations that factor in scheme fit and coaching philosophy. This clash of opinions may influence how the team approaches future draft assessments, especially when balancing external rankings with internal projections.